Planning

Infrastructure and Access Gaps

Aggregated access-gap indicators to support universal service analysis. Results are decision-support information, not automated funding decisions.

Mock geometry — not authoritative boundaries

Investment priority

Highlighted areas are the top ten in the current scenario.

County ranking — Mobile connectivity

Demo data

Access-gap ranking by county under the current scenario
Rank	County	Priority	Status	Population affected	Distance to infrastructure	Unconnected schools	Unconnected health facilities	Underserved share	Scenario score
1	Kitui	Very high	Addressed	1,455,405	118.1 km	1,592	113	22.9%	88.6	Summary
2	Embu	Low	In progress	1,070,481	94.6 km	636	285	17.5%	62.5	Summary
3	Migori	Low	Planned	1,424,448	42.7 km	541	209	17.5%	60.6	Summary
4	Vihiga	Medium	Addressed	829,767	82.6 km	1,150	33	35.0%	56.2	Summary
5	Nyeri	Low	Identified	1,107,311	26.2 km	1,275	101	18.0%	55.7	Summary
6	Wajir	Medium	Addressed	937,570	38.1 km	1,113	29	25.8%	50	Summary
7	Kakamega	Low	Under assessment	847,006	59.1 km	792	115	15.9%	48.6	Summary
8	Kiambu	Low	Planned	619,846	77.7 km	1,115	39	21.4%	48.6	Summary
9	Nairobi City	Very high	In progress	820,032	59.4 km	564	220	13.4%	46.3	Summary
10	Uasin Gishu	Medium	In progress	729,732	85.2 km	407	170	18.8%	46.1	Summary
11	Turkana	Very high	Identified	441,540	113.9 km	537	209	17.8%	45.4	Summary
12	Kwale	Low	In progress	1,082,182	13.6 km	791	28	19.9%	45.4	Summary
13	Homa Bay	Medium	Addressed	521,645	125.3 km	260	102	13.6%	45.2	Summary
14	Baringo	High	Addressed	558,728	102.4 km	331	282	22.2%	44.9	Summary
15	Nakuru	High	Addressed	532,902	78.9 km	744	118	16.7%	42.5	Summary
16	Nyamira	Low	Identified	135,400	98 km	1,304	172	25.9%	42.1	Summary
17	Busia	High	Addressed	577,989	21.4 km	1,490	82	18.0%	41.3	Summary
18	Tharaka Nithi	High	Planned	235,849	121.6 km	533	258	17.5%	41.3	Summary
19	Isiolo	Low	In progress	599,108	72.4 km	328	150	26.6%	38.4	Summary
20	Mombasa	High	Under assessment	928,419	41 km	43	87	25.2%	37.7	Summary